head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Vendorqwengoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-84.2
Input Price$0.03/M$1.50/M
Output Price$0.13/M$9.00/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-82.8
ai_index_agentic-61.8
ai_index_coding-100.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.062 and Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $3.75, so Qwen3.7 Flash is about 60.0 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher on 3 (Code Completion, Bulk Data Labeling, Short-Form Summarization), Gemini 3.5 Flash on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Qwen3.7 Flash was released in July 2026 and Gemini 3.5 Flash in May 2026.

Pick Qwen3.7 Flash if you need lower cost; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you need audio input or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.7 FlashGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash
SQL Generation 134 168
Code Review 132 164
Code Completion 132 119
Code Refactoring 136 162
Bug Fixing 136 176
Unit Test Generation 124 152
Code Documentation 132 141
Regex Writing 120 133
CI/CD Pipelines 120 143
Frontend Component Design 122 145
Data Analysis 124 167
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 134 153
ETL Scripting 128 152
JSON Extraction 132 138
Bulk Data Labeling 130 124
OCR / Document Parsing 131 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 146
Long-Document Summarization 138 157
Short-Form Summarization 124 121
Blog Post Writing 122 138

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.