head-to-head

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-30.

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Vendoropenaiinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score89.238.6
Input Price$2.00/M$0.02/M
Output Price$10.00/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,050,000262,144
Max Output128,00032,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index85.540.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and GPT-6.1 Sol costs $4.50, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 123.6 times cheaper for the same work.

GPT-6.1 Sol reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Ling 3.0 Flash VL offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score GPT-6.1 Sol leads 89.2 to 38.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash VL on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Pick GPT-6.1 Sol if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskOpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
SQL Generation 143 136
Code Review 148 134
Code Completion 119 130
Code Refactoring 149 134
Bug Fixing 152 138
Unit Test Generation 134 126
Code Documentation 137 130
Regex Writing 126 124
CI/CD Pipelines 130 122
Frontend Component Design 132 126
Data Analysis 136 130
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 130
ETL Scripting 140 128
JSON Extraction 121 132
Bulk Data Labeling 118 130
OCR / Document Parsing 135 130
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 130
Long-Document Summarization 150 136
Short-Form Summarization 117 126
Blog Post Writing 131 124

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.