head-to-head

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Vendoropenaigoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.048.4
Input Price$2.00/M$0.07/M
Output Price$12.00/M$0.23/M
Context Window1,050,000262,144
Max Output128,000235,929
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index90.742.4
ai_index_agentic78.218.1
ai_index_coding100.064.9
eqbench-56.3

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.12 and GPT-5.6 Terra costs $5.00, so Gemma 4 26B A4B is about 40.4 times cheaper for the same work.

GPT-5.6 Terra reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Gemma 4 26B A4B .

Only Gemma 4 26B A4B offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score GPT-5.6 Terra leads 93.0 to 48.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Gemma 4 26B A4B on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

GPT-5.6 Terra was released in July 2026 and Gemma 4 26B A4B in April 2026.

Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemma 4 26B A4B if you need lower cost or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskOpenAI: GPT-5.6 TerraGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B
SQL Generation 171 153
Code Review 168 150
Code Completion 119 131
Code Refactoring 165 148
Bug Fixing 181 156
Unit Test Generation 155 140
Code Documentation 141 136
Regex Writing 135 130
CI/CD Pipelines 145 133
Frontend Component Design 147 136
Data Analysis 171 148
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 143
ETL Scripting 155 141
JSON Extraction 138 142
Bulk Data Labeling 123 133
OCR / Document Parsing 147 138
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 138
Long-Document Summarization 159 147
Short-Form Summarization 122 129
Blog Post Writing 140 131

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.