head-to-head

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Vendoropenaiqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score89.452.9
Input Price$0.20/M$0.10/M
Output Price$1.20/M$0.90/M
Context Window1,050,000262,144
Max Output128,000235,929
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index84.552.2
ai_index_agentic75.235.3
ai_index_coding100.069.1

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.33 and GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.50, so Qwen3.6 35B A3B is about 1.5 times cheaper for the same work.

GPT-5.6 Luna reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score GPT-5.6 Luna leads 89.4 to 52.9.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

GPT-5.6 Luna was released in July 2026 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B in April 2026.

Pick GPT-5.6 Luna if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Qwen3.6 35B A3B if you need lower cost or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskOpenAI: GPT-5.6 LunaQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SQL Generation 171 154
Code Review 166 147
Code Completion 133 130
Code Refactoring 163 144
Bug Fixing 179 156
Unit Test Generation 154 140
Code Documentation 143 133
Regex Writing 136 129
CI/CD Pipelines 144 132
Frontend Component Design 146 137
Data Analysis 170 151
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 141
ETL Scripting 154 138
JSON Extraction 149 143
Bulk Data Labeling 135 133
OCR / Document Parsing 146 138
Table Extraction from PDFs 146 138
Long-Document Summarization 159 142
Short-Form Summarization 132 128
Blog Post Writing 140 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.