MoonshotAI: Kimi Latest vs Google: Gemini Flash Latest
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.
| MoonshotAI: Kimi Latest | Google: Gemini Flash Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~moonshotai | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.16/M | $0.75/M |
| Output Price | $10.14/M | $3.75/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 943,718 | 65,536 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini Flash Latest costs $1.69 and Kimi Latest costs $2.69, so Gemini Flash Latest is about 1.6 times cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.
Only Gemini Flash Latest offers audio input.
Across the 10 tasks where they differ, Gemini Flash Latest on 10 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Code Documentation and others).
Pick Gemini Flash Latest if you need lower cost, audio input or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | MoonshotAI: Kimi Latest | Google: Gemini Flash Latest |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 133 |
| Code Completion | 129 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 129 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 117 | 119 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 133 |
| JSON Extraction | 129 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 126 | 128 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 137 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 121 | 123 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 121 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →