head-to-head

Meta: Muse Wonder vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-13.

Meta: Muse Wonder inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Vendormetainclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score90.238.6
Input Price$4.00/M$0.02/M
Output Price$20.00/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output943,71832,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index86.440.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and Muse Wonder costs $9.00, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 247.3 times cheaper for the same work.

Muse Wonder reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Muse Wonder offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score Muse Wonder leads 90.2 to 38.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Muse Wonder scores higher on 15 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash VL on 5 (Code Completion, Regex Writing, JSON Extraction and others).

Muse Wonder was released in October 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL in September 2026.

Pick Muse Wonder if you need long documents, audio input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskMeta: Muse WonderinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
SQL Generation 142 136
Code Review 148 134
Code Completion 116 130
Code Refactoring 149 134
Bug Fixing 152 138
Unit Test Generation 134 126
Code Documentation 135 130
Regex Writing 123 124
CI/CD Pipelines 130 122
Frontend Component Design 132 126
Data Analysis 137 130
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 135 130
ETL Scripting 140 128
JSON Extraction 119 132
Bulk Data Labeling 114 130
OCR / Document Parsing 135 130
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 130
Long-Document Summarization 149 136
Short-Form Summarization 115 126
Blog Post Writing 130 124

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Wonder vs StepFun: Step 5 Preview Meta: Muse Wonder vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 Meta: Muse Wonder vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) Meta: Muse Wonder vs Mistral: Mistral Large 4 Meta: Muse Wonder vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro Meta: Muse Wonder vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro (batch) Meta: Muse Wonder vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Meta: Muse Wonder vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.