head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)
Vendorinclusionaithinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.470.5
Input Price$0.02/M$0.50/M
Output Price$0.06/M$2.02/M
Context Window262,144524,288
Max Output32,768-
Tool Calling
Structured Output-
Reasoning Mode
Vision-
Audio-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.469.8
ai_index_agentic48.456.3
ai_index_coding83.685.9

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashThinking Machines: Inkling (batch)
SQL Generation 159 156
Code Review 152 156
Code Completion 130 132
Code Refactoring 148 154
Bug Fixing 162 171
Unit Test Generation 144 140
Code Documentation 135 141
Regex Writing 132 133
CI/CD Pipelines 135 136
Frontend Component Design 110 138
Data Analysis 158 157
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 139
ETL Scripting 142 145
JSON Extraction 146 134
Bulk Data Labeling 134 130
OCR / Document Parsing 95 136
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 136
Long-Document Summarization 146 155
Short-Form Summarization 130 130
Blog Post Writing 133 136

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)