head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-14.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)
Vendorgooglethinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score89.770.5
Input Price$0.19/M$0.50/M
Output Price$0.94/M$2.02/M
Context Window1,048,576524,288
Max Output65,536-
Tool Calling
Structured Output-
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.469.8
ai_index_agentic74.456.3
ai_index_coding100.085.9

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)
SQL Generation 172 156
Code Review 168 156
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 165 154
Bug Fixing 181 171
Unit Test Generation 155 140
Code Documentation 144 141
Regex Writing 137 133
CI/CD Pipelines 145 136
Frontend Component Design 147 138
Data Analysis 171 157
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 139
ETL Scripting 155 145
JSON Extraction 149 134
Bulk Data Labeling 135 130
OCR / Document Parsing 147 136
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 136
Long-Document Summarization 161 155
Short-Form Summarization 132 130
Blog Post Writing 141 136

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max