inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.
| inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | inclusionai | ~z-ai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.06/M | $0.03/M |
| Output Price | $0.18/M | $0.08/M |
| Context Window | 131,072 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 32,768 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GLM Flash Latest costs $0.054 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.10, so GLM Flash Latest is about 1.9 times cheaper for the same work.
GLM Flash Latest reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 197 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.
Across the 15 tasks where they differ, GLM Flash Latest on 15 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).
Ling 3.0 Flash VL was released in September 2026 and GLM Flash Latest in August 2026.
Pick GLM Flash Latest if you need lower cost, long documents or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL | Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 128 | 134 |
| Code Review | 121 | 132 |
| Code Completion | 126 | 132 |
| Code Refactoring | 119 | 136 |
| Bug Fixing | 125 | 136 |
| Unit Test Generation | 118 | 124 |
| Code Documentation | 121 | 132 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 114 | 120 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 123 | 134 |
| ETL Scripting | 117 | 128 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 130 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 125 | 131 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 125 | 131 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 121 | 138 |
| Blog Post Writing | 116 | 122 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →