head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorinclusionaithinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Input Price$0.06/M$1.00/M
Output Price$0.18/M$4.05/M
Context Window131,072524,288
Max Output32,768471,859
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓-
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.10 and Inkling costs $2.01, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 19.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Inkling reads up to 524,288 tokens at once, roughly 786 pages of text, against about 197 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Ling 3.0 Flash VL offers structured output and video input; only Inkling offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 12 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Unit Test Generation and others), Inkling on 8 (Code Review, Code Refactoring, Bug Fixing and others).

Ling 3.0 Flash VL was released in September 2026 and Inkling in July 2026.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost, structured output or video input; pick Inkling if you need long documents or audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 128 125
Code Review 121 128
Code Completion 126 119
Code Refactoring 119 132
Bug Fixing 125 136
Unit Test Generation 118 116
Code Documentation 121 131
Regex Writing 120 119
CI/CD Pipelines 114 116
Frontend Component Design 122 118
Data Analysis 124 120
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 123 121
ETL Scripting 117 124
JSON Extraction 132 111
Bulk Data Labeling 129 116
OCR / Document Parsing 125 123
Table Extraction from PDFs 125 123
Long-Document Summarization 121 137
Short-Form Summarization 124 115
Blog Post Writing 116 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.