head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
Vendorinclusionai~deepseek
Quality Score10099
Input Price$0.06/M$0.04/M
Output Price$0.18/M$0.30/M
Context Window131,0721,048,576
Max Output32,768943,718
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.10 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest costs $0.12, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is slightly cheaper for the same work.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 197 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Ling 3.0 Flash VL offers image input and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 8 (Regex Writing, Frontend Component Design, Data Analysis and others), DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest on 12 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Ling 3.0 Flash VL was released in September 2026 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest in August 2026.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost, image input or video input; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest if you need long documents.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
SQL Generation 128 133
Code Review 121 131
Code Completion 126 131
Code Refactoring 119 135
Bug Fixing 125 135
Unit Test Generation 118 123
Code Documentation 121 131
Regex Writing 120 119
CI/CD Pipelines 114 119
Frontend Component Design 122 91
Data Analysis 124 123
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 123 133
ETL Scripting 117 127
JSON Extraction 132 131
Bulk Data Labeling 129 129
OCR / Document Parsing 125 85
Table Extraction from PDFs 125 85
Long-Document Summarization 121 137
Short-Form Summarization 124 123
Blog Post Writing 116 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Cohere: Command A+ vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.