head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code
Vendorinclusionaibytedance-seed
Quality Score100100
Input Price$0.06/M$0.50/M
Output Price$0.18/M$3.00/M
Context Window131,072262,144
Max Output32,768131,072
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.10 and Seed-2.0-Code costs $1.25, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 11.9 times cheaper for the same work.

Seed-2.0-Code reads up to 262,144 tokens at once, roughly 393 pages of text, against about 197 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Across the 18 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 4 (Regex Writing, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Seed-2.0-Code on 14 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Ling 3.0 Flash VL was released in September 2026 and Seed-2.0-Code in August 2026.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost; pick Seed-2.0-Code if you need long documents or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code
SQL Generation 128 130
Code Review 121 126
Code Completion 126 128
Code Refactoring 119 127
Bug Fixing 125 130
Unit Test Generation 118 121
Code Documentation 121 125
Regex Writing 120 119
CI/CD Pipelines 114 117
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 123 128
ETL Scripting 117 122
JSON Extraction 132 131
Bulk Data Labeling 129 128
OCR / Document Parsing 125 128
Table Extraction from PDFs 125 128
Long-Document Summarization 121 129
Short-Form Summarization 124 123
Blog Post Writing 116 118

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.