picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
Vendorinclusionaianthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score38.687.3
Input Price$0.06/M$2.50/M
Output Price$0.18/M$12.50/M
Context Window131,0721,000,000
Max Output32,768128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index40.583.8

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLAnthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 133 142
Code Review 128 147
Code Completion 127 118
Code Refactoring 126 149
Bug Fixing 132 151
Unit Test Generation 123 134
Code Documentation 124 136
Regex Writing 124 125
CI/CD Pipelines 119 130
Frontend Component Design 126 132
Data Analysis 130 136
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 124 135
ETL Scripting 122 139
JSON Extraction 132 121
Bulk Data Labeling 129 117
OCR / Document Parsing 127 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 127 135
Long-Document Summarization 128 149
Short-Form Summarization 126 117
Blog Post Writing 121 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Cohere: Command A+ vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol Pro (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Sol vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.