head-to-head

Google: Gemini 4 Argon (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-19.

Google: Gemini 4 Argon (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5
Vendorgoogleanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score90.296.9
Input Price$1.00/M$2.00/M
Output Price$5.00/M$10.00/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output943,718128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index86.792.4

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 4 Argon (batch) costs $2.25 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $4.50, so Gemini 4 Argon (batch) is about 2.0 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.

Only Gemini 4 Argon (batch) offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 96.9 to 90.2.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 4 Argon (batch) scores higher on 7 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others), Claude Sonnet 5.5 on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Gemini 4 Argon (batch) was released in October 2026 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 in September 2026.

Pick Gemini 4 Argon (batch) if you need lower cost, audio input or video input; pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 if you need benchmark performance.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 4 Argon (batch)Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5
SQL Generation 143 143
Code Review 148 149
Code Completion 120 119
Code Refactoring 149 150
Bug Fixing 152 153
Unit Test Generation 134 135
Code Documentation 138 137
Regex Writing 127 126
CI/CD Pipelines 130 131
Frontend Component Design 132 133
Data Analysis 137 137
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 136
ETL Scripting 140 140
JSON Extraction 122 121
Bulk Data Labeling 120 118
OCR / Document Parsing 135 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 135
Long-Document Summarization 151 151
Short-Form Summarization 119 118
Blog Post Writing 131 131

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Google: Gemini 4 Argon (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Elorian: Glimpse vs Google: Gemini 4 Argon (batch) Elorian: Glimpse vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Meta: Muse Spark Open vs Google: Gemini 4 Argon (batch) Meta: Muse Spark Open vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Google: Gemini 4 Argon (batch) NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.