head-to-head

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-29.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
Vendoranthropicdeepseek
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score97.066.3
Input Price$2.00/M$0.11/M
Output Price$10.00/M$0.34/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output128,000131,072
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.465.1

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) costs $0.20 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $4.50, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is about 23.0 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 97.0 to 66.3.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on 15 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) on 5 (Code Completion, CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup, JSON Extraction and others).

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 143 141
Code Review 149 144
Code Completion 119 133
Code Refactoring 150 146
Bug Fixing 153 148
Unit Test Generation 135 131
Code Documentation 137 137
Regex Writing 126 126
CI/CD Pipelines 131 127
Frontend Component Design 133 129
Data Analysis 137 133
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 136
ETL Scripting 140 137
JSON Extraction 121 131
Bulk Data Labeling 118 129
OCR / Document Parsing 135 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 134
Long-Document Summarization 151 148
Short-Form Summarization 118 127
Blog Post Writing 131 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Space Bunny Alpha Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Cohere: Command A+ Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.