picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.4-
Input Price$0.38/M$0.03/M
Output Price$1.88/M$0.13/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index96.8-
ai_index_agentic82.5-
ai_index_coding100.0-

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
SQL Generation 173 134
Code Review 169 132
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 166 136
Bug Fixing 183 136
Unit Test Generation 156 124
Code Documentation 144 132
Regex Writing 138 120
CI/CD Pipelines 146 120
Frontend Component Design 148 122
Data Analysis 173 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 134
ETL Scripting 156 128
JSON Extraction 149 132
Bulk Data Labeling 135 130
OCR / Document Parsing 147 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 131
Long-Document Summarization 162 138
Short-Form Summarization 132 124
Blog Post Writing 142 122

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash