picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
Vendorgooglegoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.489.2
Input Price$0.38/M$0.38/M
Output Price$1.88/M$1.88/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index96.892.4
ai_index_agentic82.574.4
ai_index_coding100.0100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 173 172
Code Review 169 168
Code Completion 133 133
Code Refactoring 166 165
Bug Fixing 183 181
Unit Test Generation 156 155
Code Documentation 144 144
Regex Writing 138 137
CI/CD Pipelines 146 145
Frontend Component Design 148 147
Data Analysis 173 171
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 154
ETL Scripting 156 155
JSON Extraction 149 148
Bulk Data Labeling 135 135
OCR / Document Parsing 147 147
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 147
Long-Document Summarization 162 161
Short-Form Summarization 132 132
Blog Post Writing 142 141

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash