picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
Vendorgooglegoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.483.9
Input Price$0.38/M$0.38/M
Output Price$1.88/M$1.88/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index96.885.1
ai_index_agentic82.566.8
ai_index_coding100.0100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 173 170
Code Review 169 165
Code Completion 133 133
Code Refactoring 166 163
Bug Fixing 183 178
Unit Test Generation 156 153
Code Documentation 144 143
Regex Writing 138 136
CI/CD Pipelines 146 143
Frontend Component Design 148 145
Data Analysis 173 168
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 154
ETL Scripting 156 153
JSON Extraction 149 148
Bulk Data Labeling 135 135
OCR / Document Parsing 147 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 146
Long-Document Summarization 162 159
Short-Form Summarization 132 131
Blog Post Writing 142 140

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash