picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Vendorgooglegoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.462.0
Input Price$0.38/M$0.30/M
Output Price$1.88/M$2.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index96.861.8
ai_index_agentic82.544.8
ai_index_coding100.081.4

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SQL Generation 173 161
Code Review 169 157
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 166 156
Bug Fixing 183 166
Unit Test Generation 156 146
Code Documentation 144 140
Regex Writing 138 131
CI/CD Pipelines 146 137
Frontend Component Design 148 139
Data Analysis 173 157
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 149
ETL Scripting 156 147
JSON Extraction 149 145
Bulk Data Labeling 135 133
OCR / Document Parsing 147 143
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 143
Long-Document Summarization 162 153
Short-Form Summarization 132 129
Blog Post Writing 142 135

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash