picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-14.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorgooglethinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score89.770.5
Input Price$0.19/M$0.95/M
Output Price$0.94/M$4.05/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,536262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.469.8
ai_index_agentic74.456.3
ai_index_coding100.085.9

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)Thinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 172 164
Code Review 168 160
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 165 158
Bug Fixing 181 171
Unit Test Generation 155 148
Code Documentation 144 140
Regex Writing 137 132
CI/CD Pipelines 145 140
Frontend Component Design 147 142
Data Analysis 171 161
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 150
ETL Scripting 155 149
JSON Extraction 149 145
Bulk Data Labeling 135 133
OCR / Document Parsing 147 144
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 144
Long-Document Summarization 161 155
Short-Form Summarization 132 129
Blog Post Writing 141 136

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max