Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-12.
| Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) | Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.38/M | $0.32/M |
| Output Price | $1.88/M | $1.28/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.64 and Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) costs $0.84, so Qwen3.7 Plus is about 1.3 times cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.
Only Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) offers audio input and video input.
Across the 6 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.7 Plus on 6 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others).
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) was released in August 2026 and Qwen3.7 Plus in June 2026.
Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) if you need audio input or video input; pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) | Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Code Completion | 131 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 119 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 129 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 123 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →