head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-28.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
Vendorgoogleanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score65.587.3
Input Price$0.38/M$2.50/M
Output Price$1.88/M$12.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,536128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index64.483.8

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) costs $0.84 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) costs $5.62, so Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is about 6.7 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Opus 5 (batch) leads 87.3 to 65.5.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) scores higher on 7 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others), Claude Opus 5 (batch) on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) was released in August 2026 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) in July 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost, audio input or video input; pick Claude Opus 5 (batch) if you need benchmark performance.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 141 142
Code Review 144 147
Code Completion 132 118
Code Refactoring 146 149
Bug Fixing 148 151
Unit Test Generation 131 134
Code Documentation 137 136
Regex Writing 126 125
CI/CD Pipelines 127 130
Frontend Component Design 129 132
Data Analysis 133 136
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 135
ETL Scripting 137 139
JSON Extraction 131 121
Bulk Data Labeling 129 117
OCR / Document Parsing 134 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 135
Long-Document Summarization 148 149
Short-Form Summarization 126 117
Blog Post Writing 129 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.