head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 56.1 | 50.9 |
| Input Price | $0.75/M | $0.09/M |
| Output Price | $3.75/M | $0.30/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 235,929 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 56.1 | 27.5 |
| eqbench | - | 70.0 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 140 | 139 |
| Code Review | 142 | 140 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 131 |
| Code Refactoring | 145 | 141 |
| Bug Fixing | 146 | 144 |
| Unit Test Generation | 130 | 129 |
| Code Documentation | 136 | 134 |
| Regex Writing | 124 | 125 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 126 | 125 |
| Frontend Component Design | 128 | 128 |
| Data Analysis | 132 | 132 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 135 | 133 |
| ETL Scripting | 135 | 133 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 128 | 129 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 133 | 131 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 133 | 131 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 146 | 143 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 125 | 126 |
| Blog Post Writing | 128 | 127 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash