picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-17.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score85.6-
Input Price$1.50/M$0.07/M
Output Price$9.00/M$0.26/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index82.8-
ai_index_agentic100.0-
ai_index_coding74.2-

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen: Qwen3.5-Flash
SQL Generation 169 134
Code Review 165 132
Code Completion 119 131
Code Refactoring 162 136
Bug Fixing 181 136
Unit Test Generation 152 124
Code Documentation 141 131
Regex Writing 135 119
CI/CD Pipelines 143 120
Frontend Component Design 145 122
Data Analysis 171 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 150 134
ETL Scripting 153 128
JSON Extraction 136 131
Bulk Data Labeling 123 129
OCR / Document Parsing 144 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 144 131
Long-Document Summarization 159 138
Short-Form Summarization 122 123
Blog Post Writing 139 122

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash