head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score84.2-
Input Price$1.50/M$0.07/M
Output Price$9.00/M$0.26/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index82.8-
ai_index_agentic61.8-
ai_index_coding100.0-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.13 and Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $3.75, so Qwen3.5-Flash is about 28.8 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Qwen3.5-Flash on 3 (Code Completion, Bulk Data Labeling, Short-Form Summarization).

Gemini 3.5 Flash was released in May 2026 and Qwen3.5-Flash in February 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you need audio input or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Qwen3.5-Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen: Qwen3.5-Flash
SQL Generation 168 134
Code Review 164 132
Code Completion 119 131
Code Refactoring 162 136
Bug Fixing 176 136
Unit Test Generation 152 124
Code Documentation 141 131
Regex Writing 133 119
CI/CD Pipelines 143 120
Frontend Component Design 145 122
Data Analysis 167 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 134
ETL Scripting 152 128
JSON Extraction 138 131
Bulk Data Labeling 124 129
OCR / Document Parsing 146 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 146 131
Long-Document Summarization 157 138
Short-Form Summarization 121 123
Blog Post Writing 138 122

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Mini vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.