head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-06.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Vendordeepseekgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score57.734.2
Input Price$0.22/M$0.15/M
Output Price$0.65/M$1.25/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output262,14465,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index57.536.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.38 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) costs $0.46, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is about 1.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 57.7 to 34.2.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp scores higher on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp was released in August 2026 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) in July 2026.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp if you need lower cost, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) if you need audio input or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
SQL Generation 140 138
Code Review 142 139
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 145 141
Bug Fixing 146 143
Unit Test Generation 130 128
Code Documentation 137 135
Regex Writing 125 123
CI/CD Pipelines 126 124
Frontend Component Design 128 126
Data Analysis 132 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 135
ETL Scripting 136 133
JSON Extraction 131 131
Bulk Data Labeling 129 129
OCR / Document Parsing 133 132
Table Extraction from PDFs 133 132
Long-Document Summarization 147 143
Short-Form Summarization 126 125
Blog Post Writing 128 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Cohere: Command A+ vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.