head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-06.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
Vendordeepseekanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score57.787.3
Input Price$0.22/M$2.50/M
Output Price$0.65/M$12.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output262,144128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index57.583.8

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.38 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) costs $5.62, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is about 14.9 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Opus 5 (batch) leads 87.3 to 57.7.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp scores higher on 7 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others), Claude Opus 5 (batch) on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp was released in August 2026 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) in July 2026.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp if you need lower cost; pick Claude Opus 5 (batch) if you need benchmark performance.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpAnthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 140 142
Code Review 142 147
Code Completion 133 118
Code Refactoring 145 149
Bug Fixing 146 151
Unit Test Generation 130 134
Code Documentation 137 136
Regex Writing 125 125
CI/CD Pipelines 126 130
Frontend Component Design 128 132
Data Analysis 132 136
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 135
ETL Scripting 136 139
JSON Extraction 131 121
Bulk Data Labeling 129 117
OCR / Document Parsing 133 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 133 135
Long-Document Summarization 147 149
Short-Form Summarization 126 117
Blog Post Writing 128 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.