head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-09.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendordeepseekinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score80.152.7
Input Price$0.11/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.33/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output943,71832,768
Tool Calling
Structured Output
Reasoning Mode
Vision-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index57.841.1
ai_index_agentic79.434.6
ai_index_coding100.083.6

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch)inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 169 155
Code Review 161 147
Code Completion 133 130
Code Refactoring 159 144
Bug Fixing 175 155
Unit Test Generation 151 140
Code Documentation 141 132
Regex Writing 134 129
CI/CD Pipelines 141 132
Frontend Component Design 143 106
Data Analysis 167 152
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 143
ETL Scripting 150 138
JSON Extraction 149 145
Bulk Data Labeling 135 134
OCR / Document Parsing 145 94
Table Extraction from PDFs 145 94
Long-Document Summarization 156 141
Short-Form Summarization 131 128
Blog Post Writing 137 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash