head-to-head

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-29.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)
Vendoranthropicanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score97.0100.0
Input Price$1.00/M$2.00/M
Output Price$5.00/M$10.00/M
Context Window1,000,0001,000,000
Max Output128,000128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.495.1

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) costs $2.25 and Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) costs $4.50, so Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) is about 2.0 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) leads 100.0 to 97.0.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) scores higher on 10 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Code Documentation and others), Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) on 10 (Code Review, Code Refactoring, Bug Fixing and others).

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) if you need lower cost; pick Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) if you need benchmark performance.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch)Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)
SQL Generation 144 144
Code Review 149 150
Code Completion 120 119
Code Refactoring 150 151
Bug Fixing 153 154
Unit Test Generation 135 135
Code Documentation 139 138
Regex Writing 128 127
CI/CD Pipelines 131 131
Frontend Component Design 133 133
Data Analysis 137 138
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 137 136
ETL Scripting 140 141
JSON Extraction 122 121
Bulk Data Labeling 120 118
OCR / Document Parsing 135 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 135
Long-Document Summarization 152 152
Short-Form Summarization 119 118
Blog Post Writing 132 132

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Space Bunny Alpha Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Cohere: Command A+ Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.