head-to-head
Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.
| Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~z-ai | qwen |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 89.4 |
| Input Price | $0.07/M | $0.42/M |
| Output Price | $0.25/M | $3.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,310,720 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 943,718 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 85.8 |
| ai_index_agentic | - | 83.9 |
| ai_index_coding | - | 100.0 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 134 | 172 |
| Code Review | 132 | 167 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 133 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 164 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 181 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 155 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 143 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 136 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 145 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 147 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 172 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 134 | 154 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 154 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 148 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 134 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 147 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 147 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 138 | 160 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 132 |
| Blog Post Writing | 122 | 141 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest
Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B
Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest
Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B
Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest
Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B