Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-19.
| Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~z-ai | meta |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.05/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $0.20/M | $0.20/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 943,718 | 943,718 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GLM Flash Latest costs $0.098 and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs $0.15, so GLM Flash Latest is about 1.5 times cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.
Across the 5 tasks where they differ, GLM Flash Latest scores higher on 5 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others).
Pick GLM Flash Latest if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| Code Completion | 132 | 131 |
| Code Documentation | 132 | 131 |
| Regex Writing | 120 | 119 |
| JSON Extraction | 132 | 131 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 124 | 123 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →