head-to-head
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-23.
| Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo | Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | z-ai | qwen |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 56.8 | 54.1 |
| Input Price | $1.20/M | $0.26/M |
| Output Price | $4.00/M | $2.08/M |
| Context Window | 202,752 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 56.9 | 53.3 |
| ai_index_agentic | - | 34.2 |
| ai_index_coding | - | 75.4 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo | Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 136 | 155 |
| Code Review | 134 | 148 |
| Code Completion | 116 | 129 |
| Code Refactoring | 133 | 145 |
| Bug Fixing | 138 | 156 |
| Unit Test Generation | 126 | 140 |
| Code Documentation | 128 | 133 |
| Regex Writing | 124 | 129 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 122 | 132 |
| Frontend Component Design | 128 | 137 |
| Data Analysis | 132 | 152 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 127 | 142 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 139 |
| JSON Extraction | 123 | 143 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 120 | 133 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 129 | 139 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 129 | 139 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 134 | 143 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 117 | 128 |
| Blog Post Writing | 124 | 130 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B