picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
Vendorz-aiqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score96.7-
Input Price$0.15/M$0.03/M
Output Price$0.50/M$0.13/M
Context Window1,048,5751,000,000
Max Output943,71765,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index94.8-
ai_index_agentic96.0-
ai_index_coding100.0-

Who wins by task?

TaskZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash
SQL Generation 175 134
Code Review 170 132
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 166 136
Bug Fixing 186 136
Unit Test Generation 157 124
Code Documentation 145 132
Regex Writing 139 120
CI/CD Pipelines 147 120
Frontend Component Design 149 122
Data Analysis 176 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 134
ETL Scripting 157 128
JSON Extraction 149 132
Bulk Data Labeling 135 130
OCR / Document Parsing 147 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 131
Long-Document Summarization 162 138
Short-Form Summarization 133 124
Blog Post Writing 143 122

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash