head-to-head

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
Vendorz-aiopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-93.0
Input Price$0.05/M$1.00/M
Output Price$0.18/M$6.00/M
Context Window1,048,5761,050,000
Max Output131,072128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-90.7
ai_index_agentic-78.2
ai_index_coding-100.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) costs $0.095 and GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) costs $2.50, so GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) is about 26.3 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,050,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,575 pages.

Only GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) offers video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) scores higher on 3 (Code Completion, Bulk Data Labeling, Short-Form Summarization), GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) was released in August 2026 and GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) in July 2026.

Pick GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost or video input; pick GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) if you need the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
SQL Generation 134 172
Code Review 132 168
Code Completion 132 120
Code Refactoring 136 165
Bug Fixing 136 181
Unit Test Generation 124 155
Code Documentation 132 143
Regex Writing 120 136
CI/CD Pipelines 120 145
Frontend Component Design 122 147
Data Analysis 124 171
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 134 154
ETL Scripting 128 155
JSON Extraction 132 139
Bulk Data Labeling 129 125
OCR / Document Parsing 131 147
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 147
Long-Document Summarization 138 160
Short-Form Summarization 124 123
Blog Post Writing 122 140

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) Cohere: Command A+ vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.