Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | xiaomi | nex-agi |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.14/M | $0.07/M |
| Output Price | $0.28/M | $0.25/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 235,929 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Nex-N2.5-Pro costs $0.14 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.21, so Nex-N2.5-Pro is about 1.5 times cheaper for the same work.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Nex-N2.5-Pro.
Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers audio input and video input.
Across the 14 tasks where they differ, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on 14 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash if you need long documents, audio input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Nex-N2.5-Pro if you need lower cost.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Nex AGI: Nex-N2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 134 | 131 |
| Code Review | 132 | 126 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 129 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 127 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 130 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 121 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 126 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 117 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 134 | 128 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 122 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 128 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 128 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 138 | 129 |
| Blog Post Writing | 122 | 119 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →