Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | xiaomi | meta |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.14/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $0.28/M | $0.20/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 943,718 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs $0.15 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.21, so Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is about 1.4 times cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,573 pages.
Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers audio input.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released in September 2026 and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor in August 2026.
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash if you need audio input; pick Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor if you need lower cost.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.