head-to-head

Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Ling-3.0-flash
Vendorthinkingmachinesinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score68.764.0
Input Price$0.50/M$0.02/M
Output Price$1.20/M$0.06/M
Context Window524,288262,144
Max Output471,85932,768
Tool Calling
Structured Output-
Reasoning Mode
Vision-
Audio-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index67.962.4
ai_index_agentic52.648.4
ai_index_coding87.483.6

Who wins by task?

TaskThinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch)Ling-3.0-flash
SQL Generation 156 159
Code Review 155 152
Code Completion 133 130
Code Refactoring 154 148
Bug Fixing 170 162
Unit Test Generation 140 144
Code Documentation 141 135
Regex Writing 133 132
CI/CD Pipelines 135 135
Frontend Component Design 137 110
Data Analysis 156 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 139 145
ETL Scripting 145 142
JSON Extraction 134 146
Bulk Data Labeling 130 134
OCR / Document Parsing 136 95
Table Extraction from PDFs 136 95
Long-Document Summarization 155 146
Short-Form Summarization 130 130
Blog Post Writing 136 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Ling-3.0-flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash