head-to-head
Tencent: Hy4 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-04.
| Tencent: Hy4 | Z.ai: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | tencent | z-ai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.42/M | $0.37/M |
| Output Price | $1.25/M | $1.25/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal costs $0.68 and Hy4 costs $0.73, so GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal is slightly cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.
Only GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal offers video input.
Pick GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal if you need lower cost or video input.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Related comparisons
Tencent: Hy4 vs Crouton Alpha
Tencent: Hy4 vs Particle AI: Particle-1
Tencent: Hy4 vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra Pro
Tencent: Hy4 vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (batch)
Tencent: Hy4 vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra
Tencent: Hy4 vs OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
Tencent: Hy4 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro
Tencent: Hy4 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3.1 Flash