head-to-head

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vendorstepfunqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score50.854.9
Input Price$0.20/M$0.26/M
Output Price$1.15/M$2.08/M
Context Window262,144262,144
Max Output230,40065,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index49.953.3
ai_index_agentic35.534.2
ai_index_coding65.375.4

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.49 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.78, so Step 3.7 Flash is about 1.6 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 262,144 tokens at once, roughly 393 pages of text.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads 54.9 to 50.8.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on 1 (Code Completion), Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on 19 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Step 3.7 Flash was released in May 2026 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B in February 2026.

Pick Step 3.7 Flash if you need lower cost; pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashQwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
SQL Generation 153 155
Code Review 146 148
Code Completion 130 129
Code Refactoring 144 145
Bug Fixing 155 156
Unit Test Generation 139 140
Code Documentation 133 133
Regex Writing 129 129
CI/CD Pipelines 131 132
Frontend Component Design 136 137
Data Analysis 150 152
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 141 142
ETL Scripting 137 139
JSON Extraction 142 143
Bulk Data Labeling 133 133
OCR / Document Parsing 138 139
Table Extraction from PDFs 138 139
Long-Document Summarization 142 143
Short-Form Summarization 128 128
Blog Post Writing 129 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.