head-to-head

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Vendorstepfungoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score50.8-
Input Price$0.20/M$0.25/M
Output Price$1.15/M$1.50/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output230,40065,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index49.9-
ai_index_agentic35.5-
ai_index_coding65.3-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.49 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.62, so Step 3.7 Flash is about 1.3 times cheaper for the same work.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Step 3.7 Flash.

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on 19 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite on 1 (Code Completion).

Pick Step 3.7 Flash if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite if you need long documents or audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
SQL Generation 153 133
Code Review 146 132
Code Completion 130 131
Code Refactoring 144 136
Bug Fixing 155 136
Unit Test Generation 139 124
Code Documentation 133 131
Regex Writing 129 119
CI/CD Pipelines 131 120
Frontend Component Design 136 122
Data Analysis 150 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 141 133
ETL Scripting 137 128
JSON Extraction 142 131
Bulk Data Labeling 133 129
OCR / Document Parsing 138 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 138 131
Long-Document Summarization 142 137
Short-Form Summarization 128 123
Blog Post Writing 129 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.