picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-29.

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Vendorstepfunanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score50.394.3
Input Price$0.20/M$2.50/M
Output Price$1.15/M$12.50/M
Context Window262,1441,000,000
Max Output256,000128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index49.991.9
ai_index_agentic35.577.8
ai_index_coding65.3100.0
eqbench-83.3

Who wins by task?

TaskStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
SQL Generation 153 177
Code Review 146 178
Code Completion 130 121
Code Refactoring 144 176
Bug Fixing 155 191
Unit Test Generation 139 161
Code Documentation 133 148
Regex Writing 129 138
CI/CD Pipelines 131 151
Frontend Component Design 136 150
Data Analysis 150 176
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 141 158
ETL Scripting 137 163
JSON Extraction 142 138
Bulk Data Labeling 133 123
OCR / Document Parsing 138 149
Table Extraction from PDFs 138 149
Long-Document Summarization 142 170
Short-Form Summarization 128 123
Blog Post Writing 129 146

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)