picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-29.

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Vendorgooglestepfun
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score83.950.3
Input Price$0.75/M$0.20/M
Output Price$3.75/M$1.15/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,536256,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index82.649.9
ai_index_agentic63.935.5
ai_index_coding100.065.3

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
SQL Generation 169 153
Code Review 165 146
Code Completion 132 130
Code Refactoring 162 144
Bug Fixing 177 155
Unit Test Generation 153 139
Code Documentation 142 133
Regex Writing 135 129
CI/CD Pipelines 143 131
Frontend Component Design 145 136
Data Analysis 167 150
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 141
ETL Scripting 153 137
JSON Extraction 148 142
Bulk Data Labeling 134 133
OCR / Document Parsing 146 138
Table Extraction from PDFs 146 138
Long-Document Summarization 158 142
Short-Form Summarization 131 128
Blog Post Writing 139 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1