head-to-head
Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Sakana: Sakana Namazu | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | sakana | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 53.5 |
| Input Price | $0.95/M | $0.75/M |
| Output Price | $4.00/M | $4.50/M |
| Context Window | 262,144 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 65,536 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 53.8 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Sakana: Sakana Namazu | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 130 | 139 |
| Code Review | 126 | 142 |
| Code Completion | 128 | 132 |
| Code Refactoring | 127 | 144 |
| Bug Fixing | 130 | 146 |
| Unit Test Generation | 121 | 130 |
| Code Documentation | 125 | 135 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 124 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 117 | 126 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 128 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 132 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 128 | 135 |
| ETL Scripting | 122 | 135 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 130 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 128 | 128 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 128 | 133 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 128 | 133 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 129 | 146 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 125 |
| Blog Post Writing | 118 | 127 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu
DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)