head-to-head

Sakana: Sakana Namazu vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Sakana: Sakana Namazu Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
Vendorsakanagoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-84.2
Input Price$0.95/M$0.75/M
Output Price$4.00/M$4.50/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-82.8
ai_index_agentic-61.8
ai_index_coding-100.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) costs $1.88 and Sakana Namazu costs $1.95, so Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) is slightly cheaper for the same work.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Sakana Namazu.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) offers audio input and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Sakana Namazu was released in August 2026 and Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) in May 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost, long documents, audio input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskSakana: Sakana NamazuGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 130 169
Code Review 126 164
Code Completion 128 132
Code Refactoring 127 162
Bug Fixing 130 176
Unit Test Generation 121 152
Code Documentation 125 142
Regex Writing 119 134
CI/CD Pipelines 117 143
Frontend Component Design 122 145
Data Analysis 124 167
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 128 153
ETL Scripting 122 152
JSON Extraction 131 147
Bulk Data Labeling 128 134
OCR / Document Parsing 128 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 128 146
Long-Document Summarization 129 158
Short-Form Summarization 123 130
Blog Post Writing 118 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.