head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-21.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Vendorqwengoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score76.531.8
Input Price$2.00/M$0.15/M
Output Price$6.00/M$1.25/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output131,07265,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index74.936.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) costs $0.46 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $3.50, so Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is about 7.6 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads 76.5 to 31.8.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) was released in September 2026 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) in July 2026.

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) if you need lower cost or audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
SQL Generation 142 138
Code Review 146 139
Code Completion 119 132
Code Refactoring 148 141
Bug Fixing 150 143
Unit Test Generation 133 128
Code Documentation 137 135
Regex Writing 125 123
CI/CD Pipelines 129 124
Frontend Component Design 131 126
Data Analysis 135 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 135
ETL Scripting 138 133
JSON Extraction 122 131
Bulk Data Labeling 119 129
OCR / Document Parsing 134 132
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 132
Long-Document Summarization 149 143
Short-Form Summarization 118 125
Blog Post Writing 130 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.