head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-11.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorqwenthinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-39.4
Input Price$0.15/M$1.00/M
Output Price$0.47/M$4.05/M
Context Window1,000,000524,288
Max Output131,072471,859
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓-
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-41.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.27 and Inkling costs $2.01, so Qwen3.8 Flash is about 7.5 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.8 Flash reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 786 pages for Inkling.

Only Qwen3.8 Flash offers structured output and video input; only Inkling offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Flash scores higher on 9 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Unit Test Generation and others), Inkling on 11 (Code Review, Code Refactoring, Bug Fixing and others).

Qwen3.8 Flash was released in August 2026 and Inkling in July 2026.

Pick Qwen3.8 Flash if you need lower cost, long documents, structured output or video input; pick Inkling if you need audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 FlashThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 133 130
Code Review 132 135
Code Completion 131 119
Code Refactoring 136 138
Bug Fixing 136 143
Unit Test Generation 124 120
Code Documentation 131 134
Regex Writing 119 123
CI/CD Pipelines 120 120
Frontend Component Design 122 122
Data Analysis 124 126
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 123
ETL Scripting 128 129
JSON Extraction 131 111
Bulk Data Labeling 129 116
OCR / Document Parsing 131 125
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 125
Long-Document Summarization 137 144
Short-Form Summarization 123 117
Blog Post Writing 121 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Cohere: Command A+ vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.