head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-11.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
Vendorqwenanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-87.3
Input Price$0.15/M$2.50/M
Output Price$0.47/M$12.50/M
Context Window1,000,0001,000,000
Max Output131,072128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-83.8

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.27 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) costs $5.62, so Qwen3.8 Flash is about 21.0 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text.

Only Qwen3.8 Flash offers video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Flash scores higher on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Claude Opus 5 (batch) on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Qwen3.8 Flash was released in August 2026 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) in July 2026.

Pick Qwen3.8 Flash if you need lower cost or video input; pick Claude Opus 5 (batch) if you need the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 FlashAnthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 133 142
Code Review 132 147
Code Completion 131 118
Code Refactoring 136 149
Bug Fixing 136 151
Unit Test Generation 124 134
Code Documentation 131 136
Regex Writing 119 125
CI/CD Pipelines 120 130
Frontend Component Design 122 132
Data Analysis 124 136
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 135
ETL Scripting 128 139
JSON Extraction 131 121
Bulk Data Labeling 129 117
OCR / Document Parsing 131 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 135
Long-Document Summarization 137 149
Short-Form Summarization 123 117
Blog Post Writing 121 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.