head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-30.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorqwenthinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score55.639.4
Input Price$0.42/M$1.00/M
Output Price$3.00/M$4.05/M
Context Window1,000,000524,288
Max Output131,072471,859
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓-
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index55.641.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.8 27B costs $1.17 and Inkling costs $2.01, so Qwen3.8 27B is about 1.7 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.8 27B reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 786 pages for Inkling.

Only Qwen3.8 27B offers structured output and video input; only Inkling offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.8 27B leads 55.6 to 39.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Qwen3.8 27B was released in August 2026 and Inkling in July 2026.

Pick Qwen3.8 27B if you need lower cost, long documents, structured output, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Inkling if you need audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 27BThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 140 130
Code Review 142 135
Code Completion 132 119
Code Refactoring 144 138
Bug Fixing 146 143
Unit Test Generation 130 120
Code Documentation 136 134
Regex Writing 124 123
CI/CD Pipelines 126 120
Frontend Component Design 128 122
Data Analysis 132 126
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 135 123
ETL Scripting 135 129
JSON Extraction 131 111
Bulk Data Labeling 129 116
OCR / Document Parsing 133 125
Table Extraction from PDFs 133 125
Long-Document Summarization 146 144
Short-Form Summarization 126 117
Blog Post Writing 128 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Cohere: Command A+ vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.