picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-16.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
Vendorqwengoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-89.7
Input Price$0.45/M$0.19/M
Output Price$3.20/M$0.94/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output131,07265,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-92.4
ai_index_agentic-74.4
ai_index_coding-100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 27BGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 130 172
Code Review 126 168
Code Completion 128 133
Code Refactoring 127 165
Bug Fixing 130 181
Unit Test Generation 121 155
Code Documentation 125 144
Regex Writing 119 137
CI/CD Pipelines 117 145
Frontend Component Design 122 147
Data Analysis 124 171
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 128 154
ETL Scripting 122 155
JSON Extraction 131 149
Bulk Data Labeling 128 135
OCR / Document Parsing 128 147
Table Extraction from PDFs 128 147
Long-Document Summarization 129 161
Short-Form Summarization 123 132
Blog Post Writing 118 141

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small