head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-30.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
Vendorqwenanthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score55.663.9
Input Price$0.42/M$1.00/M
Output Price$3.00/M$5.00/M
Context Window1,000,0001,000,000
Max Output131,072128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index55.663.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.8 27B costs $1.17 and Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) costs $2.25, so Qwen3.8 27B is about 1.9 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text.

Only Qwen3.8 27B offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) leads 63.9 to 55.6.

Across the 19 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) on 15 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Qwen3.8 27B was released in August 2026 and Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) in June 2026.

Pick Qwen3.8 27B if you need lower cost or video input; pick Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 27BAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 140 141
Code Review 142 144
Code Completion 132 120
Code Refactoring 144 146
Bug Fixing 146 148
Unit Test Generation 130 131
Code Documentation 136 136
Regex Writing 124 125
CI/CD Pipelines 126 127
Frontend Component Design 128 129
Data Analysis 132 133
ETL Scripting 135 136
JSON Extraction 131 122
Bulk Data Labeling 129 120
OCR / Document Parsing 133 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 133 134
Long-Document Summarization 146 147
Short-Form Summarization 126 118
Blog Post Writing 128 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.