Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-30.
| Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | anthropic |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 55.6 | 87.3 |
| Input Price | $0.42/M | $2.50/M |
| Output Price | $3.00/M | $12.50/M |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 128,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 55.6 | 83.8 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.8 27B costs $1.17 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) costs $5.62, so Qwen3.8 27B is about 4.8 times cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text.
Only Qwen3.8 27B offers video input.
On our blended benchmark score Claude Opus 5 (batch) leads 87.3 to 55.6.
Across the 19 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Claude Opus 5 (batch) on 15 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).
Qwen3.8 27B was released in August 2026 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) in July 2026.
Pick Qwen3.8 27B if you need lower cost or video input; pick Claude Opus 5 (batch) if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B | Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 140 | 142 |
| Code Review | 142 | 147 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 118 |
| Code Refactoring | 144 | 149 |
| Bug Fixing | 146 | 151 |
| Unit Test Generation | 130 | 134 |
| Code Documentation | 136 | 136 |
| Regex Writing | 124 | 125 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 126 | 130 |
| Frontend Component Design | 128 | 132 |
| Data Analysis | 132 | 136 |
| ETL Scripting | 135 | 139 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 121 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 117 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 133 | 135 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 133 | 135 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 146 | 149 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 126 | 117 |
| Blog Post Writing | 128 | 130 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →