head-to-head
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-18.
| Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 53.4 |
| Input Price | $0.19/M | $0.06/M |
| Output Price | $1.12/M | $0.33/M |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | - |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 42.4 |
| ai_index_agentic | - | 53.0 |
| ai_index_coding | - | 37.0 |
| eqbench | - | 70.0 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 154 |
| Code Review | 132 | 152 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 132 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 150 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 162 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 140 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 138 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 131 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 134 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 136 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 152 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 141 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 142 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 139 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 132 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 137 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 137 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 150 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 129 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 133 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B